Home / Advice / Driver Not Identified as Person Liable — Keeper vs Driver Distinction
fleetUK · UK-wide

Driver Not Identified as Person Liable — Keeper vs Driver Distinction

This ground applies when a private parking charge has been issued to the registered keeper (such as a lease or fleet company) even though the actual driver can be identified, because keeper liability under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 only arises where the operator does not know both the driver's name and a current address for service (Schedule 4, paragraph 5(1)(b)). Once the driver comes forward with those details, the basis for pursuing the keeper falls away. Note that this shifts liability to the driver rather than cancelling the charge — the driver then answers the charge and can appeal it on the merits.

Legal basis

Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4, paras 4-5 — keeper liability only arises where the creditor does not know both the driver's name and a current address for service (para 5(1)(b))

Sample appeal wording

Sample wording to adapt and send yourself — it may not fit your notice or the stage you are at.

The operator has conflated keeper liability with driver liability. As the driver of the vehicle at the time, I am the correct appellant. The registered keeper (lease company) is not liable as keeper under PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 where the driver's identity is known.

Beat It writes this argument automatically

Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and sends it for you where the council takes email — guiding you through their own online form where they use one, so you press submit. The win fee is only charged if you win.

Scan my ticket

Related appeal grounds

Next steps

Get the Beat It app

Download on theApp StoreGET IT ONGoogle Play