LEZ — Approved-device record does not match PCN registration mark
On request under reg 6(5)(n), council must provide the record from the approved device. Compare the registration mark in still image against the PCN. ANPR mis-reads regularly: 'O' for '0', '8' for 'B', 'S' for '5', 'F' for 'E'. Manual verification is supposed to occur but high-volume verification is error-prone. If still image clearly shows different plate or your plate font/spacing differs, reg 8(4)(a) applies.
Legal basis
SSI 2021/177 reg 6(5)(n); reg 8(4)(a); Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 s.7
How to identify this in your case
Still image plate unclear, partially obscured, or differs from PCN registration; or your plate is personalised/regional design that camera could mis-read.
Sample appeal wording
Dear [COUNCIL], Re: PCN [PCN_NUMBER] Representation under reg 8(1); ground reg 8(4)(a). I requested the approved-device record under reg 6(5)(n). Still image shows registration [WHAT_IMAGE_SHOWS], differing from my registration [VRN]. Camera appears to have mis-read [CHARACTER]. Evidence: enlarged crop of still image; photograph of my actual plate showing font/spacing. Contravention did not occur as regards my vehicle. Please cancel. Yours faithfully, [NAME]
Replace [PARKING DATE], [NtK DATE] etc. with your own dates before sending.
Beat It writes this argument automatically
Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and submits it to the council on your behalf. Only pay if you win.
Scan my ticketSources
- SSI 2021/177 reg 6(5)(n)