Home / Advice / E-scooter rental — not the named hirer (account compromise/family use)
consumer lawUK · England & WalesDifficulty: moderate

E-scooter rental — not the named hirer (account compromise/family use)

Operator end-of-trip and damage charges are levied against the registered account holder. Where the account was used by family, friend, hacked, or a minor (illegal under terms), liability becomes contested. Under Payment Services Regulations 2017 unauthorised use is reimbursable.

Legal basis

Payment Services Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/752) regs.71-77; Consumer Credit Act 1974 ss.83-84; Consumer Rights Act 2015

How to identify this in your case

Account holder was not rider. Evidence: account holder elsewhere, actual rider admitted use, password compromise reported.

Sample appeal wording

Dear [OPERATOR], Re: Trip [REF] / Charges totalling £[AMOUNT] I was not the rider. [Briefly explain — 'My account was used without my consent by [person/unknown party]. I was at [LOCATION] at the time, evidenced by [proof].'] Under Payment Services Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/752) reg. 74, a payer is not liable for unauthorised transactions except in narrow circumstances. I notified [OPERATOR] of unauthorised use on [DATE] / hereby notify you. I request: 1. Reversal of all charges 2. Suspension of my account pending investigation 3. Confirmation no adverse credit reporting If not resolved within 15 business days I will refer to FOS and pursue Section 75 / chargeback. Yours faithfully, [NAME]

Replace [PARKING DATE], [NtK DATE] etc. with your own dates before sending.

Beat It writes this argument automatically

Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and submits it to the council on your behalf. Only pay if you win.

Scan my ticket

Sources

Related appeal grounds

Next steps

Get the Beat It app

Download on theApp StoreGET IT ONGoogle Play