Company vehicle — keeper is the company, not the named driver
Where the vehicle is registered to a company (Limited, LLP, plc), the keeper for PoFA Sch 4 purposes is the COMPANY, not the named driver — Sch 4 para 2 presumes the registered keeper is the keeper. The operator must give the NTK to a 'current address for service' for the company (Sch 4 paras 8-9): in practice the company's registered office (Companies Act 2006 s.1139) or the address on the DVLA record obtained under Sch 4 para 11. Operators frequently send NTKs to the named driver or a director/employee's home address — that is not a current address for service for the company, so the keeper-liability route fails. Note this defeats KEEPER liability only: the company should not identify the driver (and no one should falsely deny driving), because a named driver can be pursued directly. A sole trader's business is not a separate legal person — if the V5C names an individual, this ground does not apply.
Legal basis
PoFA 2012 Sch 4 paras 2, 8, 9, 11 (keeper definition; NTK to a current address for service; DVLA application); Companies Act 2006 s.1139 (service on companies at registered office)
How to identify this in your case
V5C is in company name; NTK was sent to home address of director/employee; no NTK to registered office.
Sample appeal wording
Sample wording to adapt and send yourself — it may not fit your notice or the stage you are at. Replace the bracketed prompts with your own details; leave any case citation as it is.
Dear [OPERATOR], Re: NTK [REF] — Vehicle [REG] The vehicle is registered to [COMPANY NAME], company number [NUMBER]. I am [an employee / director] but I am not the keeper for the purposes of Schedule 4 PoFA 2012. Under paragraph 2, 'keeper' is the registered keeper, which is the company. Under section 1139 Companies Act 2006, valid service on a company is at its registered office, which is [ADDRESS]. Your NTK was sent to my personal address and is therefore not a valid Notice to Keeper. Without valid service of an NTK compliant with Sch 4 paras 8/9, you cannot establish keeper liability under para 4(4). I require: 1. Cancellation of the personal address charge; 2. Erasure of my personal data under UK GDPR Art 17; 3. If you wish to pursue the company, serve correctly at its registered office. The company is then entitled to identify (or decline to identify) the driver. Yours faithfully, [NAME]
Beat It writes this argument automatically
Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and sends it for you where the council takes email — guiding you through their own online form where they use one, so you press submit. The win fee is only charged if you win.
Scan my ticketSources
- PoFA 2012 Sch 4 paras 2, 8, 9, 11
- Companies Act 2006 s.1139
Related appeal grounds
- Aberdeen Clean Air Zone ticket issued too early
- Appealing a Scottish tribunal's legal error to a higher tribunal
- Attorney acting for keeper under Scottish power of attorney
- Bailiff acted without proper advance warning notice
- Bath CAZ — Sunset Period for Pre-Registered Commercial Vehicles
- Bay Obstructed or Too Small — Could Not Park Within the Bay Markings