Bath CAZ — Boundary Camera at Misleading Location

Bath CAZ has cameras at locations where through-traffic could plausibly avoid the zone but the boundary signage is unclear. Photographic evidence of inadequate signage at the entry point is grounds for cancellation.

Legal basis

Bath CAZ Order; TSRGD 2016; Herron principles

How to identify this in your case

Site photos / Street View show inadequate boundary signage at the relevant entry point.

Sample appeal wording

To: Bath & NES CAZ Team Re: CAZ PCN [PCN_NUMBER] I entered via [LOCATION]. Photographic evidence (dated [DATE]) shows boundary signage is [missing / obscured / non-prescribed]. Applying Herron v Sunderland CC [2011] EWHC 2762, signage that does not adequately convey the restriction renders the contravention unenforceable. Please cancel. Yours faithfully, [Driver Name]

Replace [PARKING DATE], [NtK DATE] etc. with your own dates before sending.

Beat It writes this argument automatically

Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and submits it to the council on your behalf. Only pay if you win.

Scan my ticket

Sources

Bath CAZ Order
TSRGD 2016
Herron v Sunderland CC [2011] EWHC 2762